ICCO November 2026 bulletin preview: what cocoa traders should watch
4 min read · Public
What to watch in ICCO’s November bulletin: season coverage, withheld estimates, surplus revisions and stocks. The calendar’s 30 November noon entry is an expected window, not a confirmed release time.
When is the November ICCO bulletin due?
November is one of ICCO’s four regular publication months. As checked on 12 November 2026, we have not verified an official November release date or clock time.
The Cocoa Market Hub calendar entry on 30 November at 12:00 is an expected monitoring window. It is not confirmation that ICCO will publish at noon that day. Check ICCO’s news page ↗ for an official announcement.
What is the most important question?
Will ICCO publish the estimates that were previously withheld? The August 2026 public release said 2025/26 production and grindings data were temporarily withheld. That makes coverage itself a material question, before any new number is interpreted.
Do not assume the November bulletin will restore those figures, or publish a 2026/27 forecast. Read the season headings and any methodological caveats before comparing it with private forecasters.
The published baseline
August’s public summary gave the following estimates for 2024/25:
Measure
August estimate for 2024/25
Gross production
4.733 million tonnes
Grindings
4.649 million tonnes
Surplus
37,000 tonnes
Ending stocks
1.309 million tonnes
Stocks/grindings
28.2%
These are old-season estimates, not a 2026/27 surplus forecast. Our historical comparison ↗ shows how that same season’s estimates changed across earlier bulletins.
What would be new information?
Our research priorities are the scope of the new estimates, revisions for comparable seasons, the production-versus-demand explanation, and changes to the stock cushion. A newly available season estimate should be labelled an initial published estimate rather than compared as if an absent prior number were zero.
If ICCO continues withholding a series, that is a limitation on the available evidence. It does not itself establish a surplus or deficit.
Scenarios to prepare
A tighter balance caused by lower production would raise different questions from one caused by stronger grindings. The first calls for closer examination of origin output; the second calls for closer examination of processing demand.
A looser balance caused by weaker grindings might challenge a demand-recovery narrative. A looser balance caused by higher production might indicate improving crop availability. Those are conditional interpretations, not forecasts of the forthcoming figures.
Even a substantial revision may already be partly reflected in prices. Record expectations before release so the analysis is about new information rather than the headline alone.
What not to infer
Do not combine ICCO’s 2024/25 estimate with another analyst’s 2026/27 forecast and call the difference a revision. Do not treat global stocks as identical to exchange inventories. Do not assign an immediate price move to the bulletin without knowing when it became publicly available.
Follow cocoa research with our free Morning Brief, scheduled Monday–Friday at 7am UK. Sign up for free email updates ↗ and select Morning Brief. No paid membership is required to receive it.
The August article contains an inconsistent May dateline; ICCO’s listing and page metadata identify publication on 31 August. We use it as the August issue and do not treat the erroneous dateline as a release timestamp. This preview contains no unpublished November figures.
Additional reading context
Educational explanation added to help interpret this article. It is not a new market update or a revision to the original dated figures.
Testing the market interpretation
Treat the article’s explanation as a hypothesis to test against dated observations. Separate reported facts, comparisons and possible implications. Before accepting a conclusion, identify the contract or physical market involved, check the reporting period and ask whether a different explanation could fit the same evidence.
A useful follow-up records what would strengthen or weaken the interpretation. Seek confirmation in an independent type of evidence rather than several stories repeating the same underlying report. Keep subsequent revisions visible so that an older article remains understandable as a record of the information available at publication.
Published research and personal commentary, not personalised investment advice. Trade ideas can fail; evaluate the assumptions and dated follow-ups. The original published post is preserved.